Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61321 - 61330 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61321 - 61330 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Love v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8027 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8027 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
injury by use of a dangerous weapon. Bornes decided to resolve the case with a plea agreement. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830235 - 2024-07-23
injury by use of a dangerous weapon. Bornes decided to resolve the case with a plea agreement. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830235 - 2024-07-23
[PDF]
Thomas Jelinski v. Michael Barr
and counterclaimed for an additional $565.85 to cover the total damages to the apartment carpet. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15473 - 2017-09-21
and counterclaimed for an additional $565.85 to cover the total damages to the apartment carpet. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15473 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and Blanchard, JJ. Victoria Niemczyk appeals her judgments of conviction and sentences entered in five cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92004 - 2013-01-21
and Blanchard, JJ. Victoria Niemczyk appeals her judgments of conviction and sentences entered in five cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92004 - 2013-01-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶7 The circuit court decision in this case was a certiorari review of the Board’s refusal to hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28693 - 2014-09-15
¶7 The circuit court decision in this case was a certiorari review of the Board’s refusal to hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28693 - 2014-09-15
State v. Cornelius F.
The pertinent facts of this case begin on September 24, 1997, when Jarquita E., William C.F., Drena F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5913 - 2005-03-31
The pertinent facts of this case begin on September 24, 1997, when Jarquita E., William C.F., Drena F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5913 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Arthur B. Patton
, 593 N.W.2d 504 (Ct. App. 1999). However, we independently examine the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
, 593 N.W.2d 504 (Ct. App. 1999). However, we independently examine the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Stacey R.W.
earlier. Stacey claimed that he “wishes to litigate matters in this case.” He wrote that from past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3132 - 2017-09-19
earlier. Stacey claimed that he “wishes to litigate matters in this case.” He wrote that from past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3132 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bruce Nuttleman
. We first note the procedural posture of this case. Nuttleman argues that the State needed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13102 - 2005-03-31
. We first note the procedural posture of this case. Nuttleman argues that the State needed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13102 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190, a supreme court case that came after Rohner. ¶5 In Rohner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143831 - 2017-09-21
, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190, a supreme court case that came after Rohner. ¶5 In Rohner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143831 - 2017-09-21