Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61361 - 61370 of 83741 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61361 - 61370 of 83741 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
that there is a mandatory minimum of six months in this case. And I feel as an officer of the Court, I’m obligated to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36112 - 2014-09-15
that there is a mandatory minimum of six months in this case. And I feel as an officer of the Court, I’m obligated to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36112 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190, a supreme court case that came after Rohner. ¶5 In Rohner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143831 - 2017-09-21
, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190, a supreme court case that came after Rohner. ¶5 In Rohner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143831 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s reasoned application of the appropriate legal standard to the relevant facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159479 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court’s reasoned application of the appropriate legal standard to the relevant facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159479 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the “State’s proffer that they intend to call this witness, and that is the theory of their case relative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33150 - 2014-09-15
on the “State’s proffer that they intend to call this witness, and that is the theory of their case relative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Scott R. Nasgovitz v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Family Mut. Ins. Co., 222 Wis.2d 136, 585 N.W.2d 893 (Ct. App. 1998), to the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15216 - 2017-09-21
Family Mut. Ins. Co., 222 Wis.2d 136, 585 N.W.2d 893 (Ct. App. 1998), to the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15216 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Derek A. Hinton
by the defense. In this case, Hinton had to have known that Love gave him permission to strip the refrigerator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11583 - 2017-09-19
by the defense. In this case, Hinton had to have known that Love gave him permission to strip the refrigerator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11583 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Hanson inapplicable to the facts of Burris’s case, and that credible evidence supported the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114086 - 2017-09-21
Hanson inapplicable to the facts of Burris’s case, and that credible evidence supported the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114086 - 2017-09-21
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
overtried the case. Ondrasek v. Ondrasek, 126 Wis.2d 469, 484, 377 N.W.2d 190, 196 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7910 - 2005-03-31
overtried the case. Ondrasek v. Ondrasek, 126 Wis.2d 469, 484, 377 N.W.2d 190, 196 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7910 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ventae Parrow
maneuver because the plea bargain his attorney obtained was more than favorable. He cites no case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
maneuver because the plea bargain his attorney obtained was more than favorable. He cites no case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
course completions, and that his extended supervision was revoked because of this case. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033786 - 2025-11-11
course completions, and that his extended supervision was revoked because of this case. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033786 - 2025-11-11