Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6141 - 6150 of 22278 for WA 0821 1305 0400 [[Adefa]] Jasa Geotube Pantai Heavy Duty Jayawijaya Papua.

[PDF] State v. Scott E. Frye
of the officer's duties." WIS J I-CRIMINAL 1766 (1992). Certainly self-preservation—in this case, maintaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10831 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Frontsheet
a clear rule that the plea judge has a duty to inform and verify that the defendant understands each
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241505 - 2019-07-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
right in the building permit; (2) the building inspector did not have a positive and plain duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117904 - 2017-09-21

2006 WI 129
of the hearing, the circuit court informed Shirley E.'s counsel that counsel was "relieved of any further duties
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27428 - 2006-12-12

COURT OF APPEALS
in the building permit; (2) the building inspector did not have a positive and plain duty to issue the permit; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117904 - 2014-07-23

[PDF] WI 129
was "relieved of any further duties in this case."7 The circuit court stated that it would entertain a motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27428 - 2014-09-15

State v. Susan M. Vetos
to mislead him in the performance of his duties. We agree, although not for the reason Vetos asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5431 - 2005-03-31

Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
statute violations constituted breaches of “ministerial duties” on the part of the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8021 - 2005-03-31

Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
statute violations constituted breaches of “ministerial duties” on the part of the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7842 - 2005-03-31

Tele-Port, Inc. v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.
.”) (recognizing “duty to inquire”) (affirming trial courts’ grants of summary judgment that plaintiffs’ claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3083 - 2005-03-31