Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61451 - 61460 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61451 - 61460 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Arthur B. Patton
, 593 N.W.2d 504 (Ct. App. 1999). However, we independently examine the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
, 593 N.W.2d 504 (Ct. App. 1999). However, we independently examine the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
status because Dr. Bartholow had not seen her in a week, it concluded—based on the statute and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452936 - 2021-11-12
status because Dr. Bartholow had not seen her in a week, it concluded—based on the statute and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452936 - 2021-11-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
misrepresentation, and it dismissed that claim from the case. However, it concluded that there was a sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138605 - 2017-09-21
misrepresentation, and it dismissed that claim from the case. However, it concluded that there was a sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138605 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166271 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166271 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John A. Nutt
evaluation in another case. He was found competent. No. 04-1060-CR 3 while Mr. Nutt has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7472 - 2017-09-20
evaluation in another case. He was found competent. No. 04-1060-CR 3 while Mr. Nutt has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7472 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
to present his defense. The ALJ was concerned about timing in that six cases were scheduled for hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44868 - 2014-09-15
to present his defense. The ALJ was concerned about timing in that six cases were scheduled for hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44868 - 2014-09-15
Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. v. James P. Brennan
,” and then lists the five individual attorneys who were named as defendants in this case. Based on that letterhead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7851 - 2005-03-31
,” and then lists the five individual attorneys who were named as defendants in this case. Based on that letterhead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7851 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The court correctly pointed out that in the case McCoy relied on at trial for this proposition, Bunbury v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34999 - 2014-09-15
. The court correctly pointed out that in the case McCoy relied on at trial for this proposition, Bunbury v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34999 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP1391-CR 2 review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806858 - 2024-05-29
. No. 2023AP1391-CR 2 review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806858 - 2024-05-29
State v. Ventae Parrow
maneuver because the plea bargain his attorney obtained was more than favorable. He cites no case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14988 - 2005-03-31
maneuver because the plea bargain his attorney obtained was more than favorable. He cites no case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14988 - 2005-03-31