Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61471 - 61480 of 83778 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61471 - 61480 of 83778 for simple case search/1000.
City of Princeton v. Karen E. Grams
in this case … [the court is] satisfied that the officer did what the officer was required to do at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24894 - 2006-04-25
in this case … [the court is] satisfied that the officer did what the officer was required to do at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24894 - 2006-04-25
[PDF]
Lieutenant Garilyn Truttschel v. Police Chief Hugh Martin
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2183-FT Complete Title of Case:LIEUTENANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11184 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2183-FT Complete Title of Case:LIEUTENANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11184 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Holden
, 115 S. Ct. 1555, 1567-68 (1995). Failure to do so imperils the case. NO. 96-2182-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11183 - 2017-09-19
, 115 S. Ct. 1555, 1567-68 (1995). Failure to do so imperils the case. NO. 96-2182-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
refusal hearing case involving a police request that Nathan Bise submit to a chemical test under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233258 - 2019-01-24
refusal hearing case involving a police request that Nathan Bise submit to a chemical test under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233258 - 2019-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
with a judge.” Section 968.04(1)(a), STATS. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
with a judge.” Section 968.04(1)(a), STATS. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367802 - 2021-05-19
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367802 - 2021-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. Cf. DOR v. Family Hosp. Inc., 105 Wis. 2d 250, 254, 313 N.W.2d 828 (1982) (concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184498 - 2017-09-21
in this case. Cf. DOR v. Family Hosp. Inc., 105 Wis. 2d 250, 254, 313 N.W.2d 828 (1982) (concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184498 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
after conviction; he or she was not negligent in seeking it; it is material to an issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196635 - 2017-09-21
after conviction; he or she was not negligent in seeking it; it is material to an issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196635 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Herman Whiterabbit
to grant such relief given the procedural posture of this case. We therefore do not address that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4318 - 2017-09-19
to grant such relief given the procedural posture of this case. We therefore do not address that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4318 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
case forfeited the right to raise nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169792 - 2017-09-21
case forfeited the right to raise nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169792 - 2017-09-21