Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61481 - 61490 of 91861 for 1.
Search results 61481 - 61490 of 91861 for 1.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558137 - 2022-08-25
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558137 - 2022-08-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Gregory Holloway, pro se, challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57806 - 2014-09-15
. Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Gregory Holloway, pro se, challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57806 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Higginbotham, P.J., Dykman and Vergeront, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jason Procknow appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34263 - 2008-10-08
. Before Higginbotham, P.J., Dykman and Vergeront, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jason Procknow appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34263 - 2008-10-08
CA Blank Order
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2009-10).[1] Vance was advised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92215 - 2013-01-24
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2009-10).[1] Vance was advised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92215 - 2013-01-24
Robert H. Diamond, Sr. v. Barbara Ruszkiewicz
. Accordingly, we affirm. On December 1, 1993, the parties to this appeal signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11011 - 2005-03-31
. Accordingly, we affirm. On December 1, 1993, the parties to this appeal signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11011 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles K. B.
a judgment of the circuit court for Oneida County: Robert E. Kinney, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19672 - 2005-09-19
a judgment of the circuit court for Oneida County: Robert E. Kinney, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19672 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
Mark Cimbalnik v. Patricia Guy
reversed; writ of restitution vacated. ¶1 FINE, J. Patricia Guy appeals, pro se, from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7379 - 2017-09-20
reversed; writ of restitution vacated. ¶1 FINE, J. Patricia Guy appeals, pro se, from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7379 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Cory T. Baker
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Cory T. Baker appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7361 - 2017-09-20
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Cory T. Baker appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7361 - 2017-09-20
State v. Patricia A.M.
for Milwaukee County: DANIEL A. NOONAN, Judge. Affirmed. WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12557 - 2005-03-31
for Milwaukee County: DANIEL A. NOONAN, Judge. Affirmed. WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12557 - 2005-03-31
John Hinz v. Christopher Leet
, Defendant-Appellant. † Submitted on Briefs: August 1, 1995 Oral Argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8408 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. † Submitted on Briefs: August 1, 1995 Oral Argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8408 - 2005-03-31