Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61501 - 61510 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61501 - 61510 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
after conviction; he or she was not negligent in seeking it; it is material to an issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196635 - 2017-09-21
after conviction; he or she was not negligent in seeking it; it is material to an issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196635 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
with a judge.” Section 968.04(1)(a), STATS. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
with a judge.” Section 968.04(1)(a), STATS. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presented evidence that the theft was $24,276.40, an amount sufficient to prove the criminal case against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64800 - 2014-09-15
presented evidence that the theft was $24,276.40, an amount sufficient to prove the criminal case against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64800 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
affirm that portion of the trial court’s order. ¶2 In this case, Newson previously appealed[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12
affirm that portion of the trial court’s order. ¶2 In this case, Newson previously appealed[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
that he delivered the fatal blow. Further, the theory of the case that counsel chose was a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
that he delivered the fatal blow. Further, the theory of the case that counsel chose was a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also argues that § 705.15(8)’s 120-day statute of repose does not apply in this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780085 - 2024-03-27
also argues that § 705.15(8)’s 120-day statute of repose does not apply in this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780085 - 2024-03-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
course completions, and that his extended supervision was revoked because of this case. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033786 - 2025-11-11
course completions, and that his extended supervision was revoked because of this case. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033786 - 2025-11-11
Gregg E. Waterman v. Theresa Roetter
on December 27th, Waterman called Gross to testify in Carolyn G.’s case in chief, even though Gross had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14155 - 2005-03-31
on December 27th, Waterman called Gross to testify in Carolyn G.’s case in chief, even though Gross had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14155 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.32 (2019-20).1 The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617084 - 2023-01-31
809.32 (2019-20).1 The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617084 - 2023-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that is properly before this court at this time. BACKGROUND ¶2 The charges at issue in this case stemmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78232 - 2012-02-21
that is properly before this court at this time. BACKGROUND ¶2 The charges at issue in this case stemmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78232 - 2012-02-21