Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61511 - 61520 of 83778 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61511 - 61520 of 83778 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ extended supervision, consecutive to the sentence imposed in the Michigan case resulting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251762 - 2019-12-23
’ extended supervision, consecutive to the sentence imposed in the Michigan case resulting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251762 - 2019-12-23
State v. Robert E. Christophel
in misdemeanor cases such as these are governed by the procedure for appeals in felony cases under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4156 - 2005-03-31
in misdemeanor cases such as these are governed by the procedure for appeals in felony cases under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4156 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is that the matter was filed twice. The original case (Winnebago county circuit case No. 2007CF307) was scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92069 - 2014-09-15
is that the matter was filed twice. The original case (Winnebago county circuit case No. 2007CF307) was scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92069 - 2014-09-15
Viola G. Bodach v. Village of Fontana-On-Geneva Lake
in this case is cognizable under § 74.37. In proceedings before the Board, some of the taxpayers complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11480 - 2005-03-31
in this case is cognizable under § 74.37. In proceedings before the Board, some of the taxpayers complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11480 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Arthur B. Patton
, 593 N.W.2d 504 (Ct. App. 1999). However, we independently examine the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
, 593 N.W.2d 504 (Ct. App. 1999). However, we independently examine the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
status because Dr. Bartholow had not seen her in a week, it concluded—based on the statute and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452936 - 2021-11-12
status because Dr. Bartholow had not seen her in a week, it concluded—based on the statute and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452936 - 2021-11-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
misrepresentation, and it dismissed that claim from the case. However, it concluded that there was a sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138605 - 2017-09-21
misrepresentation, and it dismissed that claim from the case. However, it concluded that there was a sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138605 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166271 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166271 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to present his defense. The ALJ was concerned about timing in that six cases were scheduled for hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44868 - 2014-09-15
to present his defense. The ALJ was concerned about timing in that six cases were scheduled for hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44868 - 2014-09-15
Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. v. James P. Brennan
,” and then lists the five individual attorneys who were named as defendants in this case. Based on that letterhead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7851 - 2005-03-31
,” and then lists the five individual attorneys who were named as defendants in this case. Based on that letterhead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7851 - 2005-03-31