Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61531 - 61540 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61531 - 61540 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Chad D. Everts
. 2 We note the plea negotiations in this case occurred after the matter had proceeded to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19
. 2 We note the plea negotiations in this case occurred after the matter had proceeded to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19
Gregg E. Waterman v. Theresa Roetter
on December 27th, Waterman called Gross to testify in Carolyn G.’s case in chief, even though Gross had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14155 - 2005-03-31
on December 27th, Waterman called Gross to testify in Carolyn G.’s case in chief, even though Gross had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14155 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles G. Campbell
as other cases relying on Wolverton and Powell, the State contends that some inconsistency exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7257 - 2017-09-20
as other cases relying on Wolverton and Powell, the State contends that some inconsistency exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7257 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ivan C. Mitchell
that the jury wants to hear the story and unnecessary objections disrupt the flow of the case. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21487 - 2017-09-21
that the jury wants to hear the story and unnecessary objections disrupt the flow of the case. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21487 - 2017-09-21
Scott R. Nasgovitz v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
), to the facts of this case was misplaced and, further, that this court’s decision in Hanson v. Prudential Prop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15216 - 2005-03-31
), to the facts of this case was misplaced and, further, that this court’s decision in Hanson v. Prudential Prop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15216 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John L. Burns v. Douglas M. Scheel
that the trial court's first result was correct. The record demonstrates that this is a case of unexplained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11789 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court's first result was correct. The record demonstrates that this is a case of unexplained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11789 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. ¶12 In this case, the circuit court properly determined that the Bruces had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996776 - 2025-08-20
. Id. ¶12 In this case, the circuit court properly determined that the Bruces had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996776 - 2025-08-20
State v. Cornelius F.
The pertinent facts of this case begin on September 24, 1997, when Jarquita E., William C.F., Drena F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5915 - 2005-03-31
The pertinent facts of this case begin on September 24, 1997, when Jarquita E., William C.F., Drena F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5915 - 2005-03-31
Wiederholt Excavating & Trench v. William Probst
at the construction site. The problem in this case was not caused by the location of the approved plans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14154 - 2005-03-31
at the construction site. The problem in this case was not caused by the location of the approved plans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14154 - 2005-03-31
State v. Herman Whiterabbit
was not entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice because the State’s case was dependent upon the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31
was not entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice because the State’s case was dependent upon the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31