Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6161 - 6170 of 68284 for did.
Search results 6161 - 6170 of 68284 for did.
State v. Daniel W. Harr
Harr’s objection, Sapp testified that Stelter did not seek any special favors or consideration when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11822 - 2005-03-31
Harr’s objection, Sapp testified that Stelter did not seek any special favors or consideration when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11822 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for the months of January and February 2007. The court also heard Duarte-Vestar’s testimony that he did not owe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32462 - 2008-04-16
for the months of January and February 2007. The court also heard Duarte-Vestar’s testimony that he did not owe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32462 - 2008-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
annual sex offender registration fee. Although Sturdevant did not cite the statute, that was essentially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32475 - 2008-04-16
annual sex offender registration fee. Although Sturdevant did not cite the statute, that was essentially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32475 - 2008-04-16
Peter J. Kairis v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
concluded that Kairis did not establish good cause for his late appearance. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10599 - 2005-03-31
concluded that Kairis did not establish good cause for his late appearance. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10599 - 2005-03-31
State v. Matthew Tyler
the present victim’s genitals, Tyler did so for the purpose of sexual gratification. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5702 - 2005-03-31
the present victim’s genitals, Tyler did so for the purpose of sexual gratification. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5702 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric J. Hendrickson
was criminal rather than civil; (3) the court erroneously told the jury panel before voir dire that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5230 - 2005-03-31
was criminal rather than civil; (3) the court erroneously told the jury panel before voir dire that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5230 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eugene Henry Williamson v. Steco Sales, Inc.
which the court was judging the facts of the case—much as the trial court did in this case in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10826 - 2017-09-20
which the court was judging the facts of the case—much as the trial court did in this case in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10826 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Raymond L. Harwick v. Robert F. Black
that the Blacks had adversely possessed this portion. The court did not quiet title to the entire parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12363 - 2017-09-21
that the Blacks had adversely possessed this portion. The court did not quiet title to the entire parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12363 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then filed a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30. As relevant here, he alleged that he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=591870 - 2022-11-22
then filed a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30. As relevant here, he alleged that he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=591870 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
Robert A. Novotny v. National Western Life Insurance Company
claims, erred by ruling the doctrine of mitigation did not apply, by denying any subrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10647 - 2017-09-20
claims, erred by ruling the doctrine of mitigation did not apply, by denying any subrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10647 - 2017-09-20