Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6161 - 6170 of 63537 for records.

[PDF] State v. Bernard E. Burgess
, address or correct” the errors in the PSI. Specifically, in setting out Burgess’s criminal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3279 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
are sufficiently supported by the record. We therefore affirm the portion of the circuit court’s judgment ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118874 - 2014-08-04

[PDF] Ken Hur v.
and recorded legal documents relating to those business dealings, and handled incompetently a legal matter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17078 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2011AP2987 2 the admission into evidence of recorded statements of two witnesses violated his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95346 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dawn D. Wilson v. Patrick A. Wilson
decision and applied the correct legal standard to the facts of record. See id. We will accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15249 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Cynthia J. Danielson v. Steven G. Danielson
the dispositive issue: whether the record discloses No. 03-2081 2 a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6738 - 2017-09-20

Cynthia J. Danielson v. Steven G. Danielson
the record discloses a substantial change in circumstances to permit the reduction to Steven Danielson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6738 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
its power and because there is sufficient credible evidence in the record to uphold the findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32722 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Johnny D. Polk
by documents in the record. Polk failed to communicate with Bartell, told a witness not to come to court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3533 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Ryan Joseph Pierce v. Kimberly Jean Pierce
brief. However, we conclude that the record discloses a rational basis for the court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5779 - 2017-09-19