Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6161 - 6170 of 12935 for tried.
Search results 6161 - 6170 of 12935 for tried.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
choosing to be tried by another tribunal.” Id. An exception to this general rule exists “when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108746 - 2017-09-21
choosing to be tried by another tribunal.” Id. An exception to this general rule exists “when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108746 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
, there was no trial. Accordingly, no issues were tried either expressly or implicitly, and the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4470 - 2017-09-19
, there was no trial. Accordingly, no issues were tried either expressly or implicitly, and the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4470 - 2017-09-19
State v. James Peterson
and tried. Vogler testified that he informed Peterson at the beginning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13437 - 2005-03-31
and tried. Vogler testified that he informed Peterson at the beginning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13437 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing court’s intent: “It’s clear the [previous] sentencing court tried to give you a break, but also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91312 - 2013-01-07
sentencing court’s intent: “It’s clear the [previous] sentencing court tried to give you a break, but also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91312 - 2013-01-07
COURT OF APPEALS
the denial of Lester’s suppression motion, the matter was tried to the court on stipulated facts. Lester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37033 - 2009-07-01
the denial of Lester’s suppression motion, the matter was tried to the court on stipulated facts. Lester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37033 - 2009-07-01
State v. Quinton K. Washington
. The case was tried to a jury. Washington was convicted. He filed a postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10844 - 2005-03-31
. The case was tried to a jury. Washington was convicted. He filed a postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10844 - 2005-03-31
Lawrence J. Plourde v. John Berends
of the Department of Building Inspection, violated the open meetings law. The case was tried to a jury, which found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25437 - 2006-08-08
of the Department of Building Inspection, violated the open meetings law. The case was tried to a jury, which found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25437 - 2006-08-08
CA Blank Order
allowed to file a suppression motion, the issue would be tried to the court, not a jury. Moreover
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101935 - 2013-09-10
allowed to file a suppression motion, the issue would be tried to the court, not a jury. Moreover
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101935 - 2013-09-10
CA Blank Order
a case is tried without a jury, the trial court “shall find the ultimate facts and state separately its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139882 - 2015-04-21
a case is tried without a jury, the trial court “shall find the ultimate facts and state separately its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139882 - 2015-04-21
State v. Michael J. Stuempfig
Stuempfig and would allow the evidence. The case was tried to a jury on May 2–4, 2005. The jury found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20882 - 2006-01-09
Stuempfig and would allow the evidence. The case was tried to a jury on May 2–4, 2005. The jury found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20882 - 2006-01-09