Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61621 - 61630 of 83879 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61621 - 61630 of 83879 for simple case search/1000.
Robert J. Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Board of Appeals
2005 WI App 106 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP1787
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7584 - 2005-05-24
2005 WI App 106 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP1787
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7584 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708334 - 2023-10-03
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708334 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Jose G.
terminating his parental rights to Joe F. The dispositive issue in this case is whether the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10894 - 2017-09-20
terminating his parental rights to Joe F. The dispositive issue in this case is whether the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10894 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Norbert W. Ellis
, Ellis claims trial counsel failed to: (1) adequately investigate Ellis’s case; (2) call witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5860 - 2017-09-19
, Ellis claims trial counsel failed to: (1) adequately investigate Ellis’s case; (2) call witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5860 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument as contrary to the plain language of the statute and prior case law. ¶7 Next, Ramczyk argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
argument as contrary to the plain language of the statute and prior case law. ¶7 Next, Ramczyk argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason E. Fladhammer
“without consent and with intent to steal.” He pled not guilty to both, and the case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4985 - 2017-09-19
“without consent and with intent to steal.” He pled not guilty to both, and the case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4985 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
cooperation in this case. The trial court denied relief, finding that Lee was not a credible witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39043 - 2014-09-15
cooperation in this case. The trial court denied relief, finding that Lee was not a credible witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39043 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John A. Nutt
evaluation in another case. He was found competent. No. 04-1060-CR 3 while Mr. Nutt has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7472 - 2017-09-20
evaluation in another case. He was found competent. No. 04-1060-CR 3 while Mr. Nutt has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7472 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
you heard from each of [the witnesses], that’s the evidence of this case. [The victim’s] testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18
you heard from each of [the witnesses], that’s the evidence of this case. [The victim’s] testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18
[PDF]
Manor Park Village v. Robin Spoden
of the case. The application of a statute to a set of facts is an issue we decide de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9750 - 2017-09-19
of the case. The application of a statute to a set of facts is an issue we decide de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9750 - 2017-09-19