Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61651 - 61660 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Although the record is not entirely clear, it appears the circuit court concluded the deputy had probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164829 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Clinton L. Duhm
the record by stating that Putzke immediately observed that Duhm was not Ryan Quinn. Nos. 03-0112
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6098 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Rogelio Cabral v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
affirming the ALJ's decision, LIRC noted that it had reviewed the record and agreed with the ALJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8390 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Lawson Bender v. Karmen Lindhal
will. 6 The transfer tax return stated that the transfer was a "reformation of prior recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8396 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the record.’” State v. Muth, 2020 WI 65, ¶16, 392 Wis. 2d 578, 945 N.W.2d 645 (citing § 973.20(1r
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095820 - 2026-03-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the applicable law to the facts of record. First, it was reasonable for the circuit court to construe Turner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94664 - 2014-09-15

State v. Juan Mata
passengers. A record check revealed that one of the passengers was wanted on an outstanding warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14602 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher Anderson
whether the trial court exercised its discretion in accordance with the facts in the record and accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21458 - 2006-02-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, with appropriate references to the record.” (Emphasis added.) The statement of the case in Baker’s principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97503 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that the ALJ “did not credit” Warmington and Haaker’s testimony, and the Commission’s review of the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61578 - 2011-03-21