Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61651 - 61660 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61651 - 61660 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
status because Dr. Bartholow had not seen her in a week, it concluded—based on the statute and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452936 - 2021-11-12
status because Dr. Bartholow had not seen her in a week, it concluded—based on the statute and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452936 - 2021-11-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶7 The circuit court decision in this case was a certiorari review of the Board’s refusal to hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28693 - 2014-09-15
¶7 The circuit court decision in this case was a certiorari review of the Board’s refusal to hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28693 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence at issue in this case is a police report prepared by the Grant County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134108 - 2017-09-21
evidence at issue in this case is a police report prepared by the Grant County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134108 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Westcott
that the court did not sentence based partly on speculative assertions of fact. We affirm. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12076 - 2017-09-21
that the court did not sentence based partly on speculative assertions of fact. We affirm. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12076 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument as contrary to the plain language of the statute and prior case law. ¶7 Next, Ramczyk argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
argument as contrary to the plain language of the statute and prior case law. ¶7 Next, Ramczyk argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
misrepresentation, and it dismissed that claim from the case. However, it concluded that there was a sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138605 - 2017-09-21
misrepresentation, and it dismissed that claim from the case. However, it concluded that there was a sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138605 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234056 - 2019-02-06
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234056 - 2019-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166271 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166271 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John A. Nutt
evaluation in another case. He was found competent. No. 04-1060-CR 3 while Mr. Nutt has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7472 - 2017-09-20
evaluation in another case. He was found competent. No. 04-1060-CR 3 while Mr. Nutt has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7472 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 161
2010 WI APP 161 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1399-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56896 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 161 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1399-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56896 - 2014-09-15