Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61671 - 61680 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61671 - 61680 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042021 - 2025-11-26
and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042021 - 2025-11-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
State v. Jackie C.
] direct[s a jury] to find.” See Wis JI—Civil 100. Thus, where, as in this case, proof of certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5342 - 2005-03-31
] direct[s a jury] to find.” See Wis JI—Civil 100. Thus, where, as in this case, proof of certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5342 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
406, 659 N.W.2d 394. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case concerns a routine traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196751 - 2017-10-02
406, 659 N.W.2d 394. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case concerns a routine traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196751 - 2017-10-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
, effective January 1, 2007. The date of the final order in the present case is January 17, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33445 - 2014-09-15
, effective January 1, 2007. The date of the final order in the present case is January 17, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33445 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but was denied access. As it was 4:15 p.m., counsel proposed adjourning until morning, as the case already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199863 - 2017-11-01
but was denied access. As it was 4:15 p.m., counsel proposed adjourning until morning, as the case already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199863 - 2017-11-01
[PDF]
State v. Thomas L. Gillen
been destroyed until the final disposition of his case. We reject these arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5615 - 2017-09-19
been destroyed until the final disposition of his case. We reject these arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5615 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
asserted that Pasniak was being inflexible with the placement schedule. The case was ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30425 - 2014-09-15
asserted that Pasniak was being inflexible with the placement schedule. The case was ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30425 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Vickie L. Shipler
In this case, the court ordered home detention for 120 days, where the minimum specified jail sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2747 - 2017-09-19
In this case, the court ordered home detention for 120 days, where the minimum specified jail sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2747 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. 2 The circuit court imposed sanctions in this case based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109275 - 2017-09-21
are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. 2 The circuit court imposed sanctions in this case based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109275 - 2017-09-21