Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6171 - 6180 of 59125 for quit claim deed.
Search results 6171 - 6180 of 59125 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
WI APP 169
to police on July 20 and 21, 2008. Hampton claims that, at the outset of the July 20 No. 2009AP3040
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56203 - 2014-09-15
to police on July 20 and 21, 2008. Hampton claims that, at the outset of the July 20 No. 2009AP3040
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56203 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 169
, 2008. Hampton claims that, at the outset of the July 20 interview, he expressly invoked his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56203 - 2010-12-13
, 2008. Hampton claims that, at the outset of the July 20 interview, he expressly invoked his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56203 - 2010-12-13
[PDF]
State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
on its claims that Huntoon had not established hardship and that the incremental grant of variances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
on its claims that Huntoon had not established hardship and that the incremental grant of variances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - 10-06-2023 Court Order
that petitioners' claims are foreclosed by this court's decision in Johnson III and are an unduly delayed
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_order.pdf - 2023-10-16
that petitioners' claims are foreclosed by this court's decision in Johnson III and are an unduly delayed
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_order.pdf - 2023-10-16
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - 10-06-2023 Court Order
that petitioners' claims are foreclosed by this court's decision in Johnson III and are an unduly delayed
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1006order.pdf - 2023-11-07
that petitioners' claims are foreclosed by this court's decision in Johnson III and are an unduly delayed
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1006order.pdf - 2023-11-07
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Appendix to Response Brief of Petitioners re: Proposed Maps
. “Partisan Symmetry and the Test for Gerrymandering Claims after LULAC v. Perry.” 6 Election L.J. 2 (2007
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224resbriefappendix.pdf - 2024-01-23
. “Partisan Symmetry and the Test for Gerrymandering Claims after LULAC v. Perry.” 6 Election L.J. 2 (2007
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224resbriefappendix.pdf - 2024-01-23
State v. Peter L. Adams
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims the trial court erred by: (1) joining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6891 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims the trial court erred by: (1) joining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6891 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Parrish
in: (1) concluding that neither claim preclusion nor issue preclusion barred the State from seeking his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3038 - 2017-09-19
in: (1) concluding that neither claim preclusion nor issue preclusion barred the State from seeking his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3038 - 2017-09-19
State v. Victor Naydihor
hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We also affirm the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16567 - 2005-03-31
hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We also affirm the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16567 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2019, represented by new counsel, Gratz filed a post- conviction motion, containing multiple claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576042 - 2022-10-13
2019, represented by new counsel, Gratz filed a post- conviction motion, containing multiple claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576042 - 2022-10-13