Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6171 - 6180 of 63198 for records.
Search results 6171 - 6180 of 63198 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence derived from a court-ordered subpoena for records from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426702 - 2021-09-16
erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence derived from a court-ordered subpoena for records from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426702 - 2021-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Thomas M. Stockland
discussions that were had on the record. ¶8 After this, the court determined that because a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5541 - 2017-09-19
discussions that were had on the record. ¶8 After this, the court determined that because a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5541 - 2017-09-19
State v. Terry Thomas
, because when the record is viewed under the totality of the circumstances, it is evident that Thomas
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17302 - 2005-03-31
, because when the record is viewed under the totality of the circumstances, it is evident that Thomas
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17302 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr.
It is not clear from the record why almost six months elapsed between the filing of the motion and the entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2294 - 2005-03-31
It is not clear from the record why almost six months elapsed between the filing of the motion and the entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
]he police reports talk about a DVD recording.” 4 However, the State asserted, “[T]here’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103799 - 2017-09-21
]he police reports talk about a DVD recording.” 4 However, the State asserted, “[T]here’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James F. Karls
se. There is nothing in the record, however, indicating that this final attorney No. 98-0695
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13728 - 2014-09-15
se. There is nothing in the record, however, indicating that this final attorney No. 98-0695
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13728 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for particularized discovery of Ida, and other issues that arose under the scheduling order.6 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=351990 - 2021-04-06
for particularized discovery of Ida, and other issues that arose under the scheduling order.6 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=351990 - 2021-04-06
State v. Colleen M. Novak
with regard to a tape-recorded statement previously given by the witness. We reject Novak’s argument that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20128 - 2005-11-01
with regard to a tape-recorded statement previously given by the witness. We reject Novak’s argument that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20128 - 2005-11-01
[PDF]
Dane Co. DHS v. Susan P. S.
). The key issue is whether the record shows “an identifiable problem or Nos. 2005AP3155 2005AP3156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24948 - 2017-09-21
). The key issue is whether the record shows “an identifiable problem or Nos. 2005AP3155 2005AP3156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24948 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FORM SUMMARY
Information from Court Record Form Number GF-183B Approval date: 09/12/2024 Page 1 of 1 Release date: 04
/formdisplay/GF-183Bs_summary.pdf?formNumber=GF-183Bs&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-04-01
Information from Court Record Form Number GF-183B Approval date: 09/12/2024 Page 1 of 1 Release date: 04
/formdisplay/GF-183Bs_summary.pdf?formNumber=GF-183Bs&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-04-01