Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61711 - 61720 of 68851 for had.
Search results 61711 - 61720 of 68851 for had.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that, when a defendant has already had a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30, § 974.06(4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881494 - 2024-11-27
that, when a defendant has already had a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30, § 974.06(4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881494 - 2024-11-27
State v. Mark A. Langenhuizen
Gilbertson, a laboratory assistant, took Langenhuizen’s blood. She testified that she had taken the blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5573 - 2005-03-31
Gilbertson, a laboratory assistant, took Langenhuizen’s blood. She testified that she had taken the blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5573 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a blood sample. The State also presented expert testimony that Broesch’s blood sample had been subjected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139096 - 2015-04-01
a blood sample. The State also presented expert testimony that Broesch’s blood sample had been subjected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139096 - 2015-04-01
County of Milwaukee v. Galila Telele
had requested Deputy Pauley as the County’s “in-court officer”—the County’s representative under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4376 - 2005-03-31
had requested Deputy Pauley as the County’s “in-court officer”—the County’s representative under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4376 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his motion would have been different had appellate counsel or an expert witness appeared
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102012 - 2017-09-21
of his motion would have been different had appellate counsel or an expert witness appeared
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102012 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 11
as provided by section 49.857, stats., or has not had a reasonable opportunity to pay the delinquency
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30920 - 2014-09-15
as provided by section 49.857, stats., or has not had a reasonable opportunity to pay the delinquency
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30920 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Stephen V. Hannigan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
there are other grounds for concluding that the claims had no reasonable basis in law or equity. CaseNumber
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14494 - 2017-09-21
there are other grounds for concluding that the claims had no reasonable basis in law or equity. CaseNumber
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14494 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of delinquent brief to the parties, noting that the respondent’s brief had not been filed as required under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901338 - 2025-01-16
of delinquent brief to the parties, noting that the respondent’s brief had not been filed as required under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901338 - 2025-01-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
if it had been requested. Counsel is not ineffective for failing to pursue a meritless argument. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129301 - 2017-09-21
if it had been requested. Counsel is not ineffective for failing to pursue a meritless argument. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129301 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Leopoldo Pequeno
that the Intoximeter EC/IR had been tested and certified as required. However, Pequeno claimed that the Intoxilyzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6142 - 2017-09-19
that the Intoximeter EC/IR had been tested and certified as required. However, Pequeno claimed that the Intoxilyzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6142 - 2017-09-19