Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61751 - 61760 of 83877 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61751 - 61760 of 83877 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267886 - 2020-07-08
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267886 - 2020-07-08
[PDF]
State v. John A. Nutt
evaluation in another case. He was found competent. No. 04-1060-CR 3 while Mr. Nutt has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7472 - 2017-09-20
evaluation in another case. He was found competent. No. 04-1060-CR 3 while Mr. Nutt has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7472 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument as contrary to the plain language of the statute and prior case law. ¶7 Next, Ramczyk argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
argument as contrary to the plain language of the statute and prior case law. ¶7 Next, Ramczyk argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502548 - 2022-04-06
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502548 - 2022-04-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234712 - 2019-02-11
briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234712 - 2019-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
that there is no room for controversy in this case as there is no denial of the material facts presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82437 - 2012-05-15
that there is no room for controversy in this case as there is no denial of the material facts presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82437 - 2012-05-15
CA Blank Order
in this case and that, but for his decision to confess, the identity of Harris’s murderer would likely have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94654 - 2013-03-26
in this case and that, but for his decision to confess, the identity of Harris’s murderer would likely have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94654 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the No. 2018AP2302 2 briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250992 - 2019-12-03
of the No. 2018AP2302 2 briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250992 - 2019-12-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ordinances, we conclude that § 82- 25(a)(2)(b)(2) does not apply in this case because there was no finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150403 - 2017-09-21
ordinances, we conclude that § 82- 25(a)(2)(b)(2) does not apply in this case because there was no finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150403 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stacey R.W.
earlier. Stacey claimed that he “wishes to litigate matters in this case.” He wrote that from past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3131 - 2017-09-19
earlier. Stacey claimed that he “wishes to litigate matters in this case.” He wrote that from past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3131 - 2017-09-19