Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6181 - 6190 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 6181 - 6190 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Jerold L. Rober
, that the error is de minimis. No. 2004AP3311-CR 4 ¶6 Rober contends on appeal that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21028 - 2017-09-21
, that the error is de minimis. No. 2004AP3311-CR 4 ¶6 Rober contends on appeal that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21028 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 402 Wis. 2d 379, 975 N.W.2d 162. “Mootness is a question of law we review de novo.” Portage County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811896 - 2024-06-11
, 402 Wis. 2d 379, 975 N.W.2d 162. “Mootness is a question of law we review de novo.” Portage County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811896 - 2024-06-11
State v. James P.F.
. The application of law to undisputed facts is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12873 - 2005-03-31
. The application of law to undisputed facts is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12873 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas L. Leck
, which we review de novo. State v. Riddle, 192 Wis.2d 470, 475, 531 N.W.2d 408, 410 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10119 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo. State v. Riddle, 192 Wis.2d 470, 475, 531 N.W.2d 408, 410 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10119 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017776 - 2025-10-02
a court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017776 - 2025-10-02
State v. John C. Schroeder
of law de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis.2d 720, 722, 490 N.W.2d 48, 50 (Ct. App. 1992). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14481 - 2005-03-31
of law de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis.2d 720, 722, 490 N.W.2d 48, 50 (Ct. App. 1992). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14481 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sommers Estates Company v. City of New Berlin
we review de novo. Id. at 472, 515 N.W.2d at 906. For the first action to bar a second action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9419 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo. Id. at 472, 515 N.W.2d at 906. For the first action to bar a second action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9419 - 2017-09-19
State v. Johnny L. Thomas
was de minimus because the encounter was inadvertent and evidence came in at trial that while in prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13192 - 2005-03-31
was de minimus because the encounter was inadvertent and evidence came in at trial that while in prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13192 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106464 - 2014-01-08
: Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106464 - 2014-01-08
[PDF]
State v. Steven G. Loveday
court's legal conclusions are, however, reviewed de novo. See Harris, at 6. Certain legal issues are so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11407 - 2017-09-19
court's legal conclusions are, however, reviewed de novo. See Harris, at 6. Certain legal issues are so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11407 - 2017-09-19