Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6181 - 6190 of 57315 for id.
Search results 6181 - 6190 of 57315 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
violated is a question of constitutional fact, subject to independent review by this court. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89394 - 2014-09-15
violated is a question of constitutional fact, subject to independent review by this court. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89394 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 830 (1990), and reviews the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo, id. at 138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123386 - 2014-10-08
N.W.2d 830 (1990), and reviews the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo, id. at 138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123386 - 2014-10-08
[PDF]
State v. Larry Cook
the existence of a new factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id. at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9132 - 2017-09-19
the existence of a new factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id. at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9132 - 2017-09-19
Eau Claire County v. Craig M. Mader
requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18255 - 2005-05-23
requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18255 - 2005-05-23
State v. Larry Cook
. 1989). A defendant must establish the existence of a new factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9132 - 2005-03-31
. 1989). A defendant must establish the existence of a new factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9132 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sa[id], “Is this your car?” He sa[id], “No, it’s not my car. The plate’s in the back seat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109998 - 2017-09-21
sa[id], “Is this your car?” He sa[id], “No, it’s not my car. The plate’s in the back seat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109998 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
without a hearing. See id., ¶¶12‑13, 36. ¶8 We first consider whether Parrett has shown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31113 - 2007-12-10
without a hearing. See id., ¶¶12‑13, 36. ¶8 We first consider whether Parrett has shown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31113 - 2007-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of fact will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99952 - 2017-09-21
court’s findings of fact will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
which is not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently entered is a manifest injustice.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30036 - 2014-09-15
which is not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently entered is a manifest injustice.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30036 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. And then I explained to him, “You have no front plate on your vehicle.” I sa[id], “Is this your car?” He sa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109998 - 2014-04-07
. And then I explained to him, “You have no front plate on your vehicle.” I sa[id], “Is this your car?” He sa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109998 - 2014-04-07