Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6181 - 6190 of 64147 for records/1000.
Search results 6181 - 6190 of 64147 for records/1000.
State v. Robert W. Miller
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2370 - 2005-03-31
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2370 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing transcript or otherwise have a full understanding of the entire record. We affirm. ¶2 In 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426094 - 2021-09-16
sentencing transcript or otherwise have a full understanding of the entire record. We affirm. ¶2 In 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426094 - 2021-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewed the appellate record, ultimately concluding that, despite proposed challenges to the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28761 - 2007-04-23
reviewed the appellate record, ultimately concluding that, despite proposed challenges to the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28761 - 2007-04-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2023-24 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2024AP1958-CRNM 2 record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925313 - 2025-03-11
are to the 2023-24 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2024AP1958-CRNM 2 record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925313 - 2025-03-11
VIP Construction, Inc. v. Rajko Andeljkovic
claim deed containing this restriction is of record in the office of the Racine County Register of Deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6620 - 2005-03-31
claim deed containing this restriction is of record in the office of the Racine County Register of Deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6620 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142829 - 2015-06-03
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142829 - 2015-06-03
Holly E. Reyniers v. Lance A. Reyniers
in the record. In a divorce proceeding, the division of property is within the discretion of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13172 - 2005-03-31
in the record. In a divorce proceeding, the division of property is within the discretion of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13172 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court reasonably considered the facts of record under the proper legal standard. See Nelson v. Taff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46065 - 2010-01-20
court reasonably considered the facts of record under the proper legal standard. See Nelson v. Taff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46065 - 2010-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. The defendant’s motion can be denied without a hearing if the record conclusively shows that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29358 - 2007-06-12
. The defendant’s motion can be denied without a hearing if the record conclusively shows that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29358 - 2007-06-12
State v. Daniel Hoyt
(1), Stats. Hoyt filed a response. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8116 - 2005-03-31
(1), Stats. Hoyt filed a response. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8116 - 2005-03-31