Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61801 - 61810 of 64797 for b's.

State v. Andrew James Garner
, basically a black male, 5'8, 5'7. There is some testimony perhaps of a dark jacket, maybe even a hat.” b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10264 - 2005-03-31

WI App 72 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1884 Complete Title of C...
-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of David J. Farley and Joshua B. Cronin of Borgelt, Powell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36214 - 2011-02-07

[PDF] State v. Bruce Rivers
.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15301 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Andrew James Garner
, maybe even a hat.” b. That a police officer will testify that they stopped someone else bearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10264 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reasons: (a) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219742 - 2018-09-25

[PDF] WI APP 59
in the first two counts of the information, (b) the jury instructions on those two counts, and (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36091 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill, 474 U.S. at 59. “[B]oth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164600 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Robert P. Goldstein v. Janusz Chiropractic Clinics
. at 416, 418 N.W.2d at 800. Therefore, the court concluded that “[b]ecause of this legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12042 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jo-El Hanson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
and due care” in selecting the treating physician. 157 Wis. 2d at 358 (citation omitted). B. Past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20171 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 152
not err in denying Stewart’s motion to suppress. B. The search of the car did not violate Stewart’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72012 - 2014-09-15