Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61851 - 61860 of 68967 for had.

COURT OF APPEALS
exculpatory evidence; and he had new evidence. The circuit court denied the motion after a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85754 - 2012-08-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the vehicle’s owner had an active warrant for her arrest as well as a revoked driver’s license. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995116 - 2025-08-13

Randy D. Schwartz v. North Farm Cooperative
that the parties had reached an agreement. Without such an agreement, the time for NFC to answer remained twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8977 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
conviction if he was not a U.S. citizen and asked Rose whether he had reviewed and understood the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93436 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jonathan P. Cole
was under the mistaken impression that the presentence writer had recommended that Cole receive a 40-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9888 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] East of the River Enterprises II v. City of Hudson
to the decision the common council made, not the decision it might have made if the ordinance had been in effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15735 - 2017-09-21

WI App 9 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP500-CR Complete Title o...
the court with a booking sheet from the Racine County Sheriff’s Department reflecting that he had spent 265
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131544 - 2015-03-11

[PDF] NOTICE
that the $1,800 upgrade was needed “because he kept getting in, or anyone else could get in. So they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46400 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Irene Dittberner v. Allen G. Luebke
received all of the latter two categories, and Gordon had disposed of the real estate before his death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15710 - 2017-09-21

Kathy Elrod v. Elroy Brommer
no rights until the testatrix’s death. If the testatrix had intended that the beneficiaries obtain rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3678 - 2005-03-31