Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6191 - 6200 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Dennis B. Robinson
a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3343 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140849 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Dontae L. Doyle
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309- 10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21020 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85649 - 2012-07-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of facts put forth by the defendant constitutes a “new factor” is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887340 - 2024-12-11

[PDF] Gordon Graham v. Linda Gerry
, 496 N.W.2d 660, 663 (Ct. App. 1992). Graham contends that we should review de novo the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15387 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Fred Brown v. Friends of Mazo Beach
a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim de novo. See Town of Eagle v. Christensen, 191 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15156 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Chad T. Montour v. Regent Insurance Company
, if appropriate. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(6) (2003-04). 1 Our review of an order granting summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7492 - 2017-09-20

Honey Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District v. Robert G. Langley
standard of reasonableness presents a question of law which we determine de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8323 - 2005-03-31

State v. Cindy Lou Kusisto
is de novo. See State v. Fields, 2001 WI App 297, ¶5, 249 Wis. 2d 292, 296, 638 N.W.2d 897, 899. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26