Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6191 - 6200 of 58966 for dos.

[PDF] State v. Beverly G.
., ¶¶28, 30. In doing so, the trial No. 04-3094 4 court shall consider the six enumerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17898 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
motion under § 974.06 may not do so without first demonstrating a sufficient reason for not raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78241 - 2012-02-21

[PDF] Ramiro Estrada v. State
the videotape, but she had nothing to do with transmitting it to Tammy’s counsel. Because S.J. is not a third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14691 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
a motion to suppress as evidence the marijuana that the police recovered when doing a protective sweep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34862 - 2008-12-10

COURT OF APPEALS
the law; a family court commissioner may not do so. After the hearing, the Department gave Michelle P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53665 - 2010-08-24

State v. Leigh A. Pedretti
to get Pedretti to leave the area, Pedretti refused to do so, and he pushed Pedretti to get him to leave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12028 - 2005-03-31

State v. Maurice Clark
should be enjoined.”). We do not reach this issue, however. Bachowski was a direct appeal from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12328 - 2005-03-31

Dane County v. Robert L. Bovee
do not apply to proceedings under ch. 799 unless the trial is to a jury. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6462 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas Deffke
it finds substantial reason not to do so. See § 973.20(1), Stats.[2] Moreover, § 973.20(4), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
this group was doing, the driver stated they were just about to leave the lot. Brann personally recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191171 - 2017-09-21