Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61951 - 61960 of 65252 for or b.
Search results 61951 - 61960 of 65252 for or b.
State v. Kevin J. McKillion
, both permissible reasons for admitting the evidence. B. McKillion’s attorney was not ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24622 - 2006-03-27
, both permissible reasons for admitting the evidence. B. McKillion’s attorney was not ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24622 - 2006-03-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2014-09-15T18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96377 - 2014-09-15
will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2014-09-15T18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96377 - 2014-09-15
State v. Chad W. Ziegler
, attorney general, and Juan B. Colas, assistant attorney general. 2006 WI App 49 COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21177 - 2006-03-22
, attorney general, and Juan B. Colas, assistant attorney general. 2006 WI App 49 COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21177 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106010 - 2017-09-21
.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106010 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. 2017-10-11T08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197681 - 2017-10-11
. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. 2017-10-11T08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197681 - 2017-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Charles Edward Hennings
deficient performance and prejudice). Thus, his claim under Rothering fails. B. Ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19667 - 2017-09-21
deficient performance and prejudice). Thus, his claim under Rothering fails. B. Ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19667 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2011AP2652-CRNM 10 B. The Reconfinement Sentence A reconfinement hearing is akin to a sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92604 - 2014-09-15
2011AP2652-CRNM 10 B. The Reconfinement Sentence A reconfinement hearing is akin to a sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92604 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5 (2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93205 - 2014-09-15
By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5 (2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93205 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.—Judgment reversed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170349 - 2017-09-21
.—Judgment reversed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170349 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason Phillips
: Appellant ATTORNEYSOn behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Arthur B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9853 - 2017-09-19
: Appellant ATTORNEYSOn behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Arthur B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9853 - 2017-09-19