Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61951 - 61960 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 61951 - 61960 of 83395 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
testimony when determining whether this was a close case, and we do not consider that testimony in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95673 - 2013-04-22
testimony when determining whether this was a close case, and we do not consider that testimony in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95673 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114318 - 2017-09-21
2 briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114318 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at No. 2017AP635-CR 2 conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207655 - 2018-01-24
, we conclude at No. 2017AP635-CR 2 conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207655 - 2018-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Michael Stubbs
N.W.2d at 756. While Stubbs accurately identifies the circumstantial aspects of the State's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9695 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d at 756. While Stubbs accurately identifies the circumstantial aspects of the State's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9695 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2013AP597 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120029 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2013AP597 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Town of Eldorado v. Harry Schmitz, Jr.
. The court concluded that this was not a case of some of the Town purposefully denying Schmitz his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5105 - 2017-09-19
. The court concluded that this was not a case of some of the Town purposefully denying Schmitz his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5105 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that his case involves an issue of arguable merit. The SPD also informs this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772930 - 2024-03-07
that his case involves an issue of arguable merit. The SPD also informs this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772930 - 2024-03-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2011-12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95780 - 2014-09-15
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2011-12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95780 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and No. 2018AP310-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231183 - 2018-12-19
and No. 2018AP310-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231183 - 2018-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
doctrine. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453178 - 2021-11-17
doctrine. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453178 - 2021-11-17