Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61981 - 61990 of 83454 for simple case search.
Search results 61981 - 61990 of 83454 for simple case search.
State v. Jerry Lee Cox
as a repeat offender. The sentence imposed in the case in which that status was at issue did not exceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13801 - 2005-03-31
as a repeat offender. The sentence imposed in the case in which that status was at issue did not exceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13801 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by Barnes’ parental-like relationship with the victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221849 - 2018-10-17
the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by Barnes’ parental-like relationship with the victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221849 - 2018-10-17
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202533 - 2017-11-13
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202533 - 2017-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
United States Supreme Court case law; and (4) he is entitled to resentencing because the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344600 - 2021-03-16
United States Supreme Court case law; and (4) he is entitled to resentencing because the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344600 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2)(a)1.-3. The County bears the burden of making its case by clear and convincing evidence. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965422 - 2025-06-03
(2)(a)1.-3. The County bears the burden of making its case by clear and convincing evidence. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965422 - 2025-06-03
Biersdorf & Associates v. Spire Capital Corporation
:1.5(a).[1] Rather, the court should review “all the circumstances of the case to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7201 - 2005-03-31
:1.5(a).[1] Rather, the court should review “all the circumstances of the case to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7201 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, as in the present case, the same judge presides at both proceedings, we will consider the original sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131575 - 2014-12-16
, as in the present case, the same judge presides at both proceedings, we will consider the original sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131575 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244192 - 2019-07-23
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244192 - 2019-07-23
[PDF]
Lisa Prince v. Zoning Board of Appeals for Rusk County
), is not applicable because that case was based on common law standards of review and this is a statutory certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9358 - 2017-09-19
), is not applicable because that case was based on common law standards of review and this is a statutory certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9358 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Vance J. Yerke
was reasonable, given the facts of the particular case, viewed at the time of counsel’s conduct. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6885 - 2017-09-20
was reasonable, given the facts of the particular case, viewed at the time of counsel’s conduct. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6885 - 2017-09-20