Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61991 - 62000 of 83358 for simple case search.
Search results 61991 - 62000 of 83358 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Billie T. Hill
circumstances and in general aid[ ] and assist[ ] the defendant to present his case as to sentence ...." Mempa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8256 - 2017-09-19
circumstances and in general aid[ ] and assist[ ] the defendant to present his case as to sentence ...." Mempa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8256 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jay Marshall Greene
as a habitual traffic offender (HTO)). The facts in this case are not in dispute. Greene’s license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14567 - 2017-09-21
as a habitual traffic offender (HTO)). The facts in this case are not in dispute. Greene’s license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14567 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94334 - 2014-09-15
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94334 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Keith R. Townsend v. Sally M. Townsend
reclassification of the property on the facts of this case. Where mixing is claimed, the claimant’s burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14859 - 2017-09-21
reclassification of the property on the facts of this case. Where mixing is claimed, the claimant’s burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14859 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey A. House
of the foregoing offenses. Wis. Stat. § 968.28 (2003-04).[1] ¶3 In this case, a Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26089 - 2006-08-02
of the foregoing offenses. Wis. Stat. § 968.28 (2003-04).[1] ¶3 In this case, a Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26089 - 2006-08-02
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114779 - 2014-06-17
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114779 - 2014-06-17
State v. Samuel D. Clay
, before the State presented its case, the court allowed an amendment to the information correcting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
, before the State presented its case, the court allowed an amendment to the information correcting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2)(a)1.-3. The County bears the burden of making its case by clear and convincing evidence. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965422 - 2025-06-03
(2)(a)1.-3. The County bears the burden of making its case by clear and convincing evidence. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965422 - 2025-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
endangerment. The court focused on the unique facts of this case. The fact that it readily dismissed any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34936 - 2008-12-22
endangerment. The court focused on the unique facts of this case. The fact that it readily dismissed any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34936 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
or mandatory parole, for the purpose of calculating the maximum reincarceration term. In both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35863 - 2014-09-15
or mandatory parole, for the purpose of calculating the maximum reincarceration term. In both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35863 - 2014-09-15