Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 621 - 630 of 6253 for cf.
Search results 621 - 630 of 6253 for cf.
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy Clark
-CF-188 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5259 - 2017-09-19
-CF-188 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5259 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
discretion on the record, we reverse that part of the judgment in 99-CF-151, and remand the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
discretion on the record, we reverse that part of the judgment in 99-CF-151, and remand the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey S. Freeman
. Appeal No. 02-0802-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-1188 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5077 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 02-0802-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-1188 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5077 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
discretion on the record, we reverse that part of the judgment in 99-CF-151, and remand the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3274 - 2005-03-31
discretion on the record, we reverse that part of the judgment in 99-CF-151, and remand the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael K. Stavlo
and label of the document to the substance and nature of the determination); cf. In re Marriage of Soergel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10660 - 2017-09-20
and label of the document to the substance and nature of the determination); cf. In re Marriage of Soergel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10660 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Paul D. Lindberg
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-0940-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-85 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5132 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-0940-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-85 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5132 - 2017-09-19
State v. Stephanie B. Holmes
correct that Holmes may not challenge the validity of the probation revocation decision. Cf. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11609 - 2005-03-31
correct that Holmes may not challenge the validity of the probation revocation decision. Cf. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11609 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kimy E. Trotter
during postconviction proceedings and on appeal. Cf. State v. Caban, 210 Wis.2d 598, 604-05, 563 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13202 - 2005-03-31
during postconviction proceedings and on appeal. Cf. State v. Caban, 210 Wis.2d 598, 604-05, 563 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13202 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
still must reject his claim. Legal issues incorporate legal arguments. Cf. State v. Weber, 164 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134399 - 2017-09-21
still must reject his claim. Legal issues incorporate legal arguments. Cf. State v. Weber, 164 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134399 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason J. Simonis
to object to counsel’s performance, not after the plea. Cf. United States v. Coffin, 76 F.3d 494, 497-98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12633 - 2017-09-21
to object to counsel’s performance, not after the plea. Cf. United States v. Coffin, 76 F.3d 494, 497-98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12633 - 2017-09-21