Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 621 - 630 of 51893 for him.
Search results 621 - 630 of 51893 for him.
[PDF]
State v. Shane R. Bartholomew
him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OMVWI), contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12474 - 2017-09-21
him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OMVWI), contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12474 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shane R. Bartholomew
. Bartholomew appeals from a judgment convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OMVWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12474 - 2005-03-31
. Bartholomew appeals from a judgment convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OMVWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12474 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, convicting him of second-degree recklessly endangering safety. Dillon also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143653 - 2015-06-29
, convicting him of second-degree recklessly endangering safety. Dillon also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143653 - 2015-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
upon his no contest pleas, convicting him of fourth-degree sexual assault and delivering between 200
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90803 - 2014-09-15
upon his no contest pleas, convicting him of fourth-degree sexual assault and delivering between 200
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90803 - 2014-09-15
City of De Pere v. Jesse J. Oskey
again commanded him to stop. Oskey ignored the officer’s command. Kerkela caught up with Oskey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19363 - 2005-08-22
again commanded him to stop. Oskey ignored the officer’s command. Kerkela caught up with Oskey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19363 - 2005-08-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to exit the vehicle, telling him, “You are not under arrest or anything.” As Phillips exited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
to exit the vehicle, telling him, “You are not under arrest or anything.” As Phillips exited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marcus A. Hicks appeals the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63464 - 2014-09-15
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Marcus A. Hicks appeals the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63464 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to exit the vehicle, telling him, “You are not under arrest or anything.” As Phillips exited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
to exit the vehicle, telling him, “You are not under arrest or anything.” As Phillips exited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
State v. Ricardo Glover
(1999-2000).[1] He argues on appeal that the trial court which convicted him lacked both personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2643 - 2005-03-31
(1999-2000).[1] He argues on appeal that the trial court which convicted him lacked both personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2643 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, fifth or sixth offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74020 - 2011-11-22
from a judgment convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, fifth or sixth offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74020 - 2011-11-22