Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 621 - 630 of 77773 for restraining order.

Kim DeValk v. Patricia A. Vadnais
DeValk initially petitioned for a temporary restraining order and injunction on September 13, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16338 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kim DeValk v. Patricia A. Vadnais
an order enjoining and restraining her from having any contact with the respondent, Kim DeValk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16338 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Court System - Court services - For the public - Self-help law center
Name change Juvenile Probate Restraining orders How the courts work Representing yourself Appeals
/services/public/selfhelp/smallclaims.htm - 2026-02-13

Wisconsin Court System - self-help law center - finding legal information
Name change Juvenile Probate Restraining orders How the courts work Representing yourself Appeals
/services/public/selfhelp/selfrep/info.htm - 2026-02-13

[PDF] NOTICE
or Sunday for two hours at a supervised site. The order also states that the parties “are restrained from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33318 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
no documents or restraining orders or temporary orders or anything that said [Kandutsch] could not come upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33318 - 2008-07-07

State v. Daniel L. Nelson
a restraining order against him. Nelson denied any physical violence. The court sentenced him to consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20890 - 2006-01-09

[PDF] State v. Daniel L. Nelson
girlfriend, Angie Arnoldi, was also victimized by Nelson and had to get a restraining order against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20890 - 2017-09-21

Bud Meyer v. Racine County
restrain a two year storm (which is defined to mean 2.7 inches of rainfall within a 24 hour period) without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6097 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - added dismissal order in case no. 2011AP902
), by considering the effects of the water level order on private wetlands located above the ordinary high water
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101059 - 2017-09-21