Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6201 - 6210 of 82870 for case search.
Search results 6201 - 6210 of 82870 for case search.
State v. Margo S. Lawinger
a search or seizure meets constitutional standards, however, is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12709 - 2005-03-31
a search or seizure meets constitutional standards, however, is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12709 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and confirmed that he lived at 3008 North 60th Street. Richards permitted the officers to search him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2012-05-05
and confirmed that he lived at 3008 North 60th Street. Richards permitted the officers to search him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2012-05-05
[PDF]
State v. James A. Bever
then viewed the tape at the neighbors’ home without first getting a search warrant, and later viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15801 - 2017-09-21
then viewed the tape at the neighbors’ home without first getting a search warrant, and later viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15801 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Maria, the State’s case primarily relied on the statements Maria made and the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334390 - 2021-02-17
of Maria, the State’s case primarily relied on the statements Maria made and the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334390 - 2021-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 905.10(3)(b) (2011-12).1 For the reasons we explain below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94658 - 2014-09-15
in this case, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 905.10(3)(b) (2011-12).1 For the reasons we explain below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94658 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a search or arrest warrant before opening the gate, and (2) excluding as hearsay not subject to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176612 - 2017-09-21
a search or arrest warrant before opening the gate, and (2) excluding as hearsay not subject to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176612 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony M. Reynolds
when it: (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence seized during the search of the residence where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10504 - 2017-09-20
when it: (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence seized during the search of the residence where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10504 - 2017-09-20
State v. Quentin D.
safety, if he had a gun on him or not,” and “conducted a pat-down search” over Quentin D.’s outer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15450 - 2005-03-31
safety, if he had a gun on him or not,” and “conducted a pat-down search” over Quentin D.’s outer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15450 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Quentin D.
search” over Quentin D.’s outer clothing. The officer testified that he “felt a very hard object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15450 - 2017-09-21
search” over Quentin D.’s outer clothing. The officer testified that he “felt a very hard object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15450 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Elizabeth Johnson v. Rexnord Plastics Corp.
employment. DVR required Johnson to conduct a ninety-day job search. When this was unsuccessful, DVR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15087 - 2017-09-21
employment. DVR required Johnson to conduct a ninety-day job search. When this was unsuccessful, DVR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15087 - 2017-09-21