Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62011 - 62020 of 83359 for simple case search.
Search results 62011 - 62020 of 83359 for simple case search.
State v. Jeffrey A. House
of the foregoing offenses. Wis. Stat. § 968.28 (2003-04).[1] ¶3 In this case, a Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26089 - 2006-08-02
of the foregoing offenses. Wis. Stat. § 968.28 (2003-04).[1] ¶3 In this case, a Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26089 - 2006-08-02
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114779 - 2014-06-17
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114779 - 2014-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
endangerment. The court focused on the unique facts of this case. The fact that it readily dismissed any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34936 - 2008-12-22
endangerment. The court focused on the unique facts of this case. The fact that it readily dismissed any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34936 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
or mandatory parole, for the purpose of calculating the maximum reincarceration term. In both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35863 - 2014-09-15
or mandatory parole, for the purpose of calculating the maximum reincarceration term. In both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35863 - 2014-09-15
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. Wisconsin Parole Commission
2000 WI App 139 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15849 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 139 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15849 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96135 - 2014-09-15
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96135 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Craig L. Miller
incarcerated for an unrelated case, he was guilty of bail jumping because he had been released on bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3348 - 2017-09-19
incarcerated for an unrelated case, he was guilty of bail jumping because he had been released on bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3348 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239492 - 2019-04-24
record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239492 - 2019-04-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
endangerment. The court focused on the unique facts of this case. The fact that it readily dismissed any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34936 - 2014-09-15
endangerment. The court focused on the unique facts of this case. The fact that it readily dismissed any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34936 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Town of Eldorado v. Harry Schmitz, Jr.
. The court concluded that this was not a case of some of the Town purposefully denying Schmitz his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5105 - 2017-09-19
. The court concluded that this was not a case of some of the Town purposefully denying Schmitz his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5105 - 2017-09-19