Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62121 - 62130 of 83574 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
endangerment. The court focused on the unique facts of this case. The fact that it readily dismissed any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34936 - 2008-12-22

[PDF] State v. Samuel D. Clay
term of imprisonment may be increased ...." At trial, before the State presented its case, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9431 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916427 - 2025-02-20

CA Blank Order
Miller in jail. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122766 - 2014-09-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in Wisconsin. Thus, in this case, WIS. STAT. ch. 822, the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622766 - 2023-02-16

Adam P. Read v. Susan Riseling
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2893, 96-2895, 96-2916, 96-2917
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17171 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243502 - 2019-07-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23

Andy Saltarikos v. Hart Donley
to have the case reopened because, he contended, he “never received notification of the court date.” ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5164 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to be served consecutively to jail time imposed in another case. The court followed the joint sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860562 - 2024-10-10