Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62141 - 62150 of 68579 for law.

CA Blank Order
, the circuit court’s sentence, which fell well within the range authorized by law, see State v. Scaccio, 2000
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111148 - 2014-04-23

State v. Stephen R. McCann
of consent is a mixed question of constitutional fact and law, and we review the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13595 - 2005-03-31

State v. Andres Godina
a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13092 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
was in violation of §§ 939.62 and 973.12, Stats., is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15440 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law … we review de novo.” Id. ¶8 The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168206 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jesse J. C.
as to be incredible as a matter of law. Id. at 298. ¶11 Jesse asserts that Hope’s threats provided a feasible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2743 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. The sentence imposed was authorized by law and not overly harsh or excessive. See Ocanas v. State, 70 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182456 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was not complicated and was proper under Wisconsin law, Kane subscribed to the restitution provision on more than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150939 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 797-98. ¶8 Wisconsin Stat. § 968.24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66557 - 2011-06-28

Robert Waldman v. Greg Rea
if it is based on the facts of record, applies the correct law, and is the product of a rational mental process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2564 - 2005-03-31