Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62181 - 62190 of 83508 for simple case search.
Search results 62181 - 62190 of 83508 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239492 - 2019-04-24
record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239492 - 2019-04-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23
Stephanie M. Kaplan v. Susan Riseling
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2893, 96-2895, 96-2916, 96-2917
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17170 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2893, 96-2895, 96-2916, 96-2917
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17170 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott A. Magnuson
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3288-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13541 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3288-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040816 - 2025-11-25
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040816 - 2025-11-25
Andy Saltarikos v. Hart Donley
to have the case reopened because, he contended, he “never received notification of the court date.” ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5164 - 2005-03-31
to have the case reopened because, he contended, he “never received notification of the court date.” ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5164 - 2005-03-31
Erika Eneman v. Pat Richter
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2893, 96-2895, 96-2916, 96-2917
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17165 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2893, 96-2895, 96-2916, 96-2917
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17165 - 2005-03-31
Tara L. Harrison v. Pat Richter
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2893, 96-2895, 96-2916, 96-2917
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17166 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2893, 96-2895, 96-2916, 96-2917
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17166 - 2005-03-31
Barron County v. Deanna C.
to proceed directly to the dispositional phase of the case. Carlos has raised no other objections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4407 - 2005-03-31
to proceed directly to the dispositional phase of the case. Carlos has raised no other objections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4407 - 2005-03-31
[MS WORD]
JD-1738A: Request to Inspect Juvenile Court Records
2 Request to Inspect Juvenile Court Records Page 3 of 2 Case No. STATE OF WISCONSIN
/formdisplay/JD-1738A.doc?formNumber=JD-1738A&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-11-16
2 Request to Inspect Juvenile Court Records Page 3 of 2 Case No. STATE OF WISCONSIN
/formdisplay/JD-1738A.doc?formNumber=JD-1738A&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-11-16