Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6221 - 6230 of 69534 for as he.
Search results 6221 - 6230 of 69534 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
that on July 20, 2012, he spoke with a witness who reported that he had overheard yelling and screaming outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133337 - 2015-01-21
that on July 20, 2012, he spoke with a witness who reported that he had overheard yelling and screaming outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133337 - 2015-01-21
State v. Mark L. Stewart
conviction used to enhance his sentence. Stewart asserts he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21509 - 2006-02-22
conviction used to enhance his sentence. Stewart asserts he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21509 - 2006-02-22
State v. Antwan Battles
to §§ 943.32(1)(a) & (2), 940.03, 939.05 and 939.32, Stats. He claims that: (1) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10871 - 2005-03-31
to §§ 943.32(1)(a) & (2), 940.03, 939.05 and 939.32, Stats. He claims that: (1) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10871 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antione Hunter
. She told the jury that Hunter called her while he was incarcerated at the Milwaukee House
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4482 - 2005-03-31
. She told the jury that Hunter called her while he was incarcerated at the Milwaukee House
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4482 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Lootans
on appeal. First, he asserts that the State failed to show that the arresting officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
on appeal. First, he asserts that the State failed to show that the arresting officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and informed of his right to respond, but he did not do so. After reviewing the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183299 - 2017-09-21
of the report and informed of his right to respond, but he did not do so. After reviewing the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183299 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark L. Stewart
to enhance his sentence. Stewart asserts he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the motion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21509 - 2017-09-21
to enhance his sentence. Stewart asserts he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the motion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21509 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals the order denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal.2 Brown argues he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85491 - 2014-09-15
appeals the order denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal.2 Brown argues he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85491 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32223 - 2008-03-25
an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32223 - 2008-03-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20).1 He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598174 - 2022-12-13
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20).1 He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598174 - 2022-12-13