Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6221 - 6230 of 36517 for certificate of divorce.

Carl J. Sweney v. Phyllis J. Sweney
' comprehensive divorce settlement, Carl agreed to pay to his former spouse, Phyllis, twenty-nine percent of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9819 - 2005-03-31

Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr. v. Mary C. Volker
. In the parties' divorce judgment, entered in 1990, the Milwaukee County Circuit Court made specific findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7769 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Delaine Tilleman v. Carol Tilleman
WIS. STAT. § 854.15 terminated her interest in the account as of the date of the divorce. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2146 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
appeals from an order modifying the property division portion of a judgment of divorce. She contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204740 - 2017-12-13

[PDF] Randall Scott Grobe v. Judy M. Grobe
divorced in 1981. Judy received custody of their two sons. Pursuant to stipulation, the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8057 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
“Liesse”) appeals from the portion of the judgment of divorce that divided marital property. She argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36690 - 2009-06-03

[PDF] Geraldine L. Roettger v. Donald H. Roettger
. Donald Roettger appeals the property division and maintenance rulings from the divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13272 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James J. Bethel v. Diana J. Hewson
and Myse, JJ. PER CURIAM. James Bethel appeals those parts of a divorce judgment dividing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11437 - 2017-09-19

Marvin J. Hartwig v. Betty L. Hartwig
., and Hoover, J. PER CURIAM. Betty Hartwig appeals those parts of a divorce judgment dividing the marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14552 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Carl J. Sweney v. Phyllis J. Sweney
. Because we conclude that it did not, we affirm. As part of the Sweneys' comprehensive divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9819 - 2017-09-19