Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6221 - 6230 of 17075 for search wicourts.gov.
Search results 6221 - 6230 of 17075 for search wicourts.gov.
COURT OF APPEALS
The constitutionality of a search and seizure is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34883 - 2008-12-15
The constitutionality of a search and seizure is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34883 - 2008-12-15
State v. Christopher Dilworth
court’s ruling, he was in custody when he was searched and questioned, and consequently, the police were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18176 - 2005-05-16
court’s ruling, he was in custody when he was searched and questioned, and consequently, the police were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18176 - 2005-05-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of cocaine. Officer Christopher Conway then completed a search warrant affidavit and obtained a no-knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488934 - 2022-03-01
of cocaine. Officer Christopher Conway then completed a search warrant affidavit and obtained a no-knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488934 - 2022-03-01
[PDF]
State v. David J. Brock
to a search of his person. We reject Brock’s argument. We affirm the judgment of conviction. HISTORY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7631 - 2017-09-19
to a search of his person. We reject Brock’s argument. We affirm the judgment of conviction. HISTORY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7631 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In January 2013, police executed a no-knock search warrant at 1608
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147788 - 2017-09-21
a trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In January 2013, police executed a no-knock search warrant at 1608
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147788 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
caretaker exception does not “justif[y] warrantless searches and seizures in the home.” Id. at 1598-1600
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670587 - 2023-06-21
caretaker exception does not “justif[y] warrantless searches and seizures in the home.” Id. at 1598-1600
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670587 - 2023-06-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. That motion, and a previously filed suppression motion, involve a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138237 - 2015-03-23
for postconviction relief. That motion, and a previously filed suppression motion, involve a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138237 - 2015-03-23
State v. Joseph K. Bryant
of Kenosha, the Kenosha County Controlled Substances Unit obtained a search warrant for that residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2377 - 2005-03-31
of Kenosha, the Kenosha County Controlled Substances Unit obtained a search warrant for that residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph K. Bryant
, the Kenosha County Controlled Substances Unit obtained a search warrant for that residence. The search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2377 - 2017-09-19
, the Kenosha County Controlled Substances Unit obtained a search warrant for that residence. The search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2377 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and a previously filed suppression motion, involve a search warrant for No. 2014AP1339-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138237 - 2017-09-21
, and a previously filed suppression motion, involve a search warrant for No. 2014AP1339-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138237 - 2017-09-21