Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6221 - 6230 of 20957 for word.
Search results 6221 - 6230 of 20957 for word.
[PDF]
WI APP 57
552, 563, 313 N.W.2d 47 (1981) (“When construing statutes, meaning should be given to every word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36168 - 2014-09-15
552, 563, 313 N.W.2d 47 (1981) (“When construing statutes, meaning should be given to every word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36168 - 2014-09-15
Northridge Company v. W.R. Grace & Company
the complaint is for physical harm or economic loss. In other words, the fact that the measure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8989 - 2005-03-31
the complaint is for physical harm or economic loss. In other words, the fact that the measure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8989 - 2005-03-31
Aurora Medical Group v. Department of Workforce Development
-emptive reach, and the words "relate to" would limit nothing. Dillingham, 519 U.S. at 329 (citing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17406 - 2005-03-31
-emptive reach, and the words "relate to" would limit nothing. Dillingham, 519 U.S. at 329 (citing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17406 - 2005-03-31
State v. Aaron D.
)(a). The words “subject to” have no well-defined meaning; used in their ordinary sense they mean “subordinate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12238 - 2005-03-31
)(a). The words “subject to” have no well-defined meaning; used in their ordinary sense they mean “subordinate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robin K. v. Lamanda M.
is expressed in the words it used." Id. We refrain from interpreting statutory language in isolation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25502 - 2017-09-21
is expressed in the words it used." Id. We refrain from interpreting statutory language in isolation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25502 - 2017-09-21
Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
that the “no reasonable use” standard applies; in other words, if the Board were to determine that the requested variance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5370 - 2005-03-31
that the “no reasonable use” standard applies; in other words, if the Board were to determine that the requested variance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5370 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Published Order
these 1849 laws represent the final word on a statute's constitutionality? No. But unquestionably
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=653159 - 2023-05-16
these 1849 laws represent the final word on a statute's constitutionality? No. But unquestionably
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=653159 - 2023-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
the word “displayed” as used in the code provision “implies something more than an individual holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110457 - 2014-04-16
the word “displayed” as used in the code provision “implies something more than an individual holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110457 - 2014-04-16
[PDF]
State v. John J. Watson
the only basis for his opinion, and that—in his own words—without that statement, “it would be virtually
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17900 - 2017-09-21
the only basis for his opinion, and that—in his own words—without that statement, “it would be virtually
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17900 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
is in conflict with the public interest that the “no reasonable use” standard applies; in other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5370 - 2017-09-19
is in conflict with the public interest that the “no reasonable use” standard applies; in other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5370 - 2017-09-19