Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62231 - 62240 of 68814 for had.
Search results 62231 - 62240 of 68814 for had.
COURT OF APPEALS
co-actors that they had intended to enter a house to commit a robbery. ¶6 Stevenson entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36403 - 2009-05-12
co-actors that they had intended to enter a house to commit a robbery. ¶6 Stevenson entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36403 - 2009-05-12
State v. Richard Graham
-jeopardy rights had not been implicated. The court did, however, order “the clerk’s office [to] amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6229 - 2005-03-31
-jeopardy rights had not been implicated. The court did, however, order “the clerk’s office [to] amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6229 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, that the defendant had no lawful authority to confine or restrain the victim, and that the defendant knew the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36380 - 2009-05-26
, that the defendant had no lawful authority to confine or restrain the victim, and that the defendant knew the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36380 - 2009-05-26
Eastmore Real Estate v. Thomas W. Seekins
at Dimartino's address when it was not apparent that Dimartino had any relationship with Seekins. The totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9193 - 2009-02-09
at Dimartino's address when it was not apparent that Dimartino had any relationship with Seekins. The totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9193 - 2009-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
had the original, rather than the amended, Information during the hearing. However, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38345 - 2005-03-31
had the original, rather than the amended, Information during the hearing. However, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38345 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chang N. Ju
charge had limited probative value in relation to the others because the evidence of each did not, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13262 - 2005-03-31
charge had limited probative value in relation to the others because the evidence of each did not, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13262 - 2005-03-31
State v. Seth A. Foster
commenced a search of the residence. Willems informed Lowe that Foster had left the premises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25995 - 2006-07-24
commenced a search of the residence. Willems informed Lowe that Foster had left the premises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25995 - 2006-07-24
State v. Timothy D. Dopke
the jury that the State had to prove that the defendant believed the person was under the age of sixteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26587 - 2006-09-27
the jury that the State had to prove that the defendant believed the person was under the age of sixteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26587 - 2006-09-27
State v. Henry James Brookshire
considered aggravating circumstances that had not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, Brookshire contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18306 - 2005-03-31
considered aggravating circumstances that had not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, Brookshire contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18306 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that counsel was more credible than Lusk, that counsel had explained the party to a crime elements to Lusk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91814 - 2015-07-20
that counsel was more credible than Lusk, that counsel had explained the party to a crime elements to Lusk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91814 - 2015-07-20