Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62241 - 62250 of 83544 for simple case search.
Search results 62241 - 62250 of 83544 for simple case search.
State v. Jonathan S.
later reverse its findings. We disagree that Terry T. is applicable to this case. Terry T. involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5131 - 2005-03-31
later reverse its findings. We disagree that Terry T. is applicable to this case. Terry T. involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5131 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92708 - 2013-02-12
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92708 - 2013-02-12
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 197. In this case, the court considered appropriate factors, such as Blue’s prior record, his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96518 - 2013-05-05
N.W.2d 197. In this case, the court considered appropriate factors, such as Blue’s prior record, his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96518 - 2013-05-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
: (1) joinder of the two cases; (2) admissibility of the fingerprint analysis; (3) the identification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116859 - 2017-09-21
: (1) joinder of the two cases; (2) admissibility of the fingerprint analysis; (3) the identification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116859 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that No. 2017AP315 2 this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210092 - 2018-03-20
conclude at conference that No. 2017AP315 2 this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210092 - 2018-03-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of the presumption of admissibility, not suppression of evidence. Zielke, 137 Wis. 2d at 51-52. Neither case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65412 - 2011-06-06
of the presumption of admissibility, not suppression of evidence. Zielke, 137 Wis. 2d at 51-52. Neither case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65412 - 2011-06-06
State v. Robert Fritsch
was entered, which in this case was the sentencing date. This court agrees and affirms the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2688 - 2005-03-31
was entered, which in this case was the sentencing date. This court agrees and affirms the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2688 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
) Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. In these consolidated cases, Thomas R. Austin appeals pro
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141483 - 2015-05-12
) Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. In these consolidated cases, Thomas R. Austin appeals pro
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141483 - 2015-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and No. 2018AP310-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231183 - 2018-12-19
and No. 2018AP310-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231183 - 2018-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916427 - 2025-02-20
and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916427 - 2025-02-20