Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 62261 - 62270 of 81960 for judges.

2007 WI APP 23
: November 6, 2006 JUDGES: Brown, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. Concurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27725 - 2014-07-21

State v. Robert A. Evans
for Walworth County: Robert J. Kennedy, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] A jury found Robert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7046 - 2005-03-31

State v. Guy W. Colstad
.† Opinion Filed: January 30, 2003 Oral Argument: June 13, 2002 JUDGES: Vergeront, P.J., Roggensack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4569 - 2005-03-31

Frederick Lee Pharm v. Byran Bartow
JUDGES: Brown, Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. Concurred: Dissented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19706 - 2005-10-27

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
Filed: May 20, 2008 Submitted on Briefs: April 29, 2008 Oral Argument: JUDGES: Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32758 - 2005-04-14

William K. Garfoot v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Argument: March 18, 1999 JUDGES: Dykman, P.J., Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14110 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] December 6, 2012
-appeal? Should LIRC’s modification of one Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) order be set aside
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90061 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - Added recently accepted cases 2011AP1121 and 2011AP1566
Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) order be set aside because LIRC’s decision was inconsistent with another
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90779 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the decisions in 2010AP2313, 2010AP2597-CR and 2011AP914
Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) order be set aside because LIRC’s decision was inconsistent with another ALJ’s
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91427 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] 2023AP001412 - Non-Party Brief of Wisconsin Legislature as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to Petition for an Original Action
: “‘an absence of actual bias’ on the part of a judge” and decisions that have not been pre-decided. Williams v
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1412_0822amicusbrief.pdf - 2023-10-16