Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6231 - 6240 of 14668 for ag.
Search results 6231 - 6240 of 14668 for ag.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Sec. 227.40(3)(ag). After this court remanded the case, Bryson filed a new brief in this same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
.” Sec. 227.40(3)(ag). After this court remanded the case, Bryson filed a new brief in this same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Sec. 227.40(3)(ag). After this court remanded the case, Bryson filed a new brief in this same
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
.” Sec. 227.40(3)(ag). After this court remanded the case, Bryson filed a new brief in this same
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and five years’ extended supervision. Referring to Emig’s age (62) at the time of sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774911 - 2024-03-13
confinement and five years’ extended supervision. Referring to Emig’s age (62) at the time of sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774911 - 2024-03-13
August F. Klitzka v. Michael J. Sullivan
of first- and third-degree sexual assault of persons under the age of thirteen. In essence, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11323 - 2005-03-31
of first- and third-degree sexual assault of persons under the age of thirteen. In essence, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11323 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Johnson was convicted of sexual assault of a child under sixteen years of age, child enticement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928081 - 2025-03-18
, Johnson was convicted of sexual assault of a child under sixteen years of age, child enticement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928081 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court concluded that an indeterminate award was not appropriate given the parties’ ages at that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813303 - 2024-06-19
. The court concluded that an indeterminate award was not appropriate given the parties’ ages at that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813303 - 2024-06-19
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Sara B.
In the Interest of Brittany B., A Child Under the Age of 18: WAUKESHA COUNTY, Petitioner-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9070 - 2017-09-19
In the Interest of Brittany B., A Child Under the Age of 18: WAUKESHA COUNTY, Petitioner-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9070 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
In re the termination of parental rights to Jonathan H., a person under the age of 18: Ozaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53438 - 2010-08-17
In re the termination of parental rights to Jonathan H., a person under the age of 18: Ozaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53438 - 2010-08-17
COURT OF APPEALS
was charged with “one count of sexual contact with a person under the age of 16 years contrary to Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38345 - 2009-07-27
was charged with “one count of sexual contact with a person under the age of 16 years contrary to Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38345 - 2009-07-27
Walworth County Department of Health & Human Services v. Carl H.
DISTRICT II In re the Termination of Parental Rights to Jon K., a Person Under the Age of 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3024 - 2005-03-31
DISTRICT II In re the Termination of Parental Rights to Jon K., a Person Under the Age of 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3024 - 2005-03-31