Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6231 - 6240 of 30142 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261017 - 2020-05-19

State v. Michael F. Hobart
is a question of law this court decides de novo. See State v. Manthey, 169 Wis.2d 673, 685, 487 N.W.2d 44, 49
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11736 - 2005-03-31

City of New Berlin v. Kenneth Pollich
. Pollich appealed to the Waukesha County Circuit Court, requesting a jury trial. That trial was de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8761 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30177 - 2007-09-04

COURT OF APPEALS
, and a jury found Thompson violated the ordinance. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23

State v. Stanley E. Young
Determining the statutory elements of a crime is a question of law; therefore, our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3355 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James Kasieta v. James Tennies
review its conclusions of law de novo. First Nat’l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis. 2d 205
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3398 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Elizabeth Lornitzo v. Frank Lornitzo
de novo. Old Tuckaway Assoc. Ltd. Partnership v. City of Greenfield, 180 Wis.2d 254, 280, 509 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7782 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017776 - 2025-10-02

Louie E. Aiello v. Gary R. McCaughtry
as the trial court. Our review is therefore de novo. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146 Wis.2d 662, 667
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7904 - 2005-03-31