Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6231 - 6240 of 12913 for prosecuting.
Search results 6231 - 6240 of 12913 for prosecuting.
COURT OF APPEALS
“for any fair and just reason, unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced.” State v. Jenkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93745 - 2013-03-12
“for any fair and just reason, unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced.” State v. Jenkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93745 - 2013-03-12
State v. James A. Cundy
and not revisited by either the prosecution or defense. ¶13 We conclude that the credibility battle was fought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4160 - 2005-03-31
and not revisited by either the prosecution or defense. ¶13 We conclude that the credibility battle was fought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4160 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. Sveum
to adequately cross-examine prosecution witnesses; (8) failed to present the proper hearsay exception to get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15993 - 2005-03-31
to adequately cross-examine prosecution witnesses; (8) failed to present the proper hearsay exception to get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15993 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Howard L. Goodman
). To determine whether a defendant is competent, “[w]hat prosecution, defense counsel, and court need to know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5515 - 2017-09-19
). To determine whether a defendant is competent, “[w]hat prosecution, defense counsel, and court need to know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5515 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the lawyer to prosecute the appeal. See McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 436 (1988). We cannot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249332 - 2019-10-30
for the lawyer to prosecute the appeal. See McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 436 (1988). We cannot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249332 - 2019-10-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a basis in fact or law that it would be unethical for the lawyer to prosecute the appeal. McCoy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
a basis in fact or law that it would be unethical for the lawyer to prosecute the appeal. McCoy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
State v. Avery T., Jr.
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31
State v. Avery T., Jr.
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8593 - 2005-03-31
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8593 - 2005-03-31
State v. Avery T., Jr.
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8592 - 2005-03-31
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Sveum
to surprise evidence; (7) failed to adequately cross-examine prosecution witnesses; (8) failed to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15993 - 2017-09-21
to surprise evidence; (7) failed to adequately cross-examine prosecution witnesses; (8) failed to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15993 - 2017-09-21