Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6241 - 6250 of 62078 for child support.
Search results 6241 - 6250 of 62078 for child support.
State v. Jamerrel Everett
of a child under sixteen years of age pursuant to § 948.02(2), Stats. The charge followed Everett’s waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14846 - 2005-03-31
of a child under sixteen years of age pursuant to § 948.02(2), Stats. The charge followed Everett’s waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14846 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to terminate a parent’s parental rights turns on the child’s best interests. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235463 - 2019-02-20
decision to terminate a parent’s parental rights turns on the child’s best interests. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235463 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
State v. Stephen T.
sexual and psychological maturity prior to trial and not presenting expert testimony that a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3243 - 2017-09-19
sexual and psychological maturity prior to trial and not presenting expert testimony that a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3243 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to terminate Samantha’s parental rights to her three daughters. The petitions as to each child alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121735 - 2014-09-16
to terminate Samantha’s parental rights to her three daughters. The petitions as to each child alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121735 - 2014-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Jamerrel Everett
a judgment of conviction for second-degree sexual assault of a child under sixteen years of age pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14846 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of conviction for second-degree sexual assault of a child under sixteen years of age pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14846 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(4). He argues that, because Julie’s father provides child care during times when Julie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144517 - 2017-09-21
(4). He argues that, because Julie’s father provides child care during times when Julie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144517 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shirley E.
supporting the order. See Evelyn C.R. v. Tykila S., 2001 WI 110, ¶¶3, 24–26, 246 Wis. 2d 1, 7, 17–18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21378 - 2017-09-21
supporting the order. See Evelyn C.R. v. Tykila S., 2001 WI 110, ¶¶3, 24–26, 246 Wis. 2d 1, 7, 17–18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21378 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
guilty pleas, convicting him of twenty-seven counts of possessing child pornography contrary to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54987 - 2010-10-04
guilty pleas, convicting him of twenty-seven counts of possessing child pornography contrary to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54987 - 2010-10-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
pleas, convicting him of twenty-seven counts of possessing child No. 2009AP1901-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54987 - 2014-09-15
pleas, convicting him of twenty-seven counts of possessing child No. 2009AP1901-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54987 - 2014-09-15
State v. Shirley E.
when the State was obligated to prove grounds supporting the order. See Evelyn C.R. v. Tykila S., 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21378 - 2006-03-22
when the State was obligated to prove grounds supporting the order. See Evelyn C.R. v. Tykila S., 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21378 - 2006-03-22